<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thin Client Applications (Web App) vs. Thick Client Application (Software App) Which is Better?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://compscistuff.com/2009/01/thin-client-applications-web-app-vs-thick-client-application-software-app-which-is-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://compscistuff.com/2009/01/thin-client-applications-web-app-vs-thick-client-application-software-app-which-is-better/</link>
	<description>Dedicated to satisfying your computer needs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:43:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: flashrash</title>
		<link>http://compscistuff.com/2009/01/thin-client-applications-web-app-vs-thick-client-application-software-app-which-is-better/comment-page-1/#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator>flashrash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://compscistuff.com/?p=274#comment-481</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to read more about this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to read more about this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ameer</title>
		<link>http://compscistuff.com/2009/01/thin-client-applications-web-app-vs-thick-client-application-software-app-which-is-better/comment-page-1/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Ameer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://compscistuff.com/?p=274#comment-185</guid>
		<description>There is also a new trend around combining the two. The Rich Applications concept is driven from the limitations of web apps. 

One big limitations of web apps is there is no easy way to do a push from a server to the desktop. Reverse Ajax only goes so far in dealing with this. I don&#039;t know if it was even doable before Ajax</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is also a new trend around combining the two. The Rich Applications concept is driven from the limitations of web apps. </p>
<p>One big limitations of web apps is there is no easy way to do a push from a server to the desktop. Reverse Ajax only goes so far in dealing with this. I don&#8217;t know if it was even doable before Ajax</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney Horne</title>
		<link>http://compscistuff.com/2009/01/thin-client-applications-web-app-vs-thick-client-application-software-app-which-is-better/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney Horne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://compscistuff.com/?p=274#comment-103</guid>
		<description>I believe a combination of the two will serve professionals the best. Outside of applications, a lot of companies are turning to thin clients to save money. What is thin client(in terms of PC hardware)? A thin client is a computer that usual only has components for sound, I/O and networking. Usually a CPU is not required but small cheap ones are implemented. These &quot;clients&quot; connect to a server and access a session of windows via terminal services. LTSP is a Linux technology that also does similar things. Essential a company only has to buy one copy of the software that runs on the server and everyone can use it(this is the combination I mentioned before). The only thing the sends back is mouse movements and keystrokes, visuals are rendered by the client. In a world where visualization is getting popular and companies are tightening there belts, I believe that thicks client apps will be reduced because they are more expensive and I believe that having access to an application on-demand is the wave of the future which thin client/thin client apps can provide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe a combination of the two will serve professionals the best. Outside of applications, a lot of companies are turning to thin clients to save money. What is thin client(in terms of PC hardware)? A thin client is a computer that usual only has components for sound, I/O and networking. Usually a CPU is not required but small cheap ones are implemented. These &#8220;clients&#8221; connect to a server and access a session of windows via terminal services. LTSP is a Linux technology that also does similar things. Essential a company only has to buy one copy of the software that runs on the server and everyone can use it(this is the combination I mentioned before). The only thing the sends back is mouse movements and keystrokes, visuals are rendered by the client. In a world where visualization is getting popular and companies are tightening there belts, I believe that thicks client apps will be reduced because they are more expensive and I believe that having access to an application on-demand is the wave of the future which thin client/thin client apps can provide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Costa</title>
		<link>http://compscistuff.com/2009/01/thin-client-applications-web-app-vs-thick-client-application-software-app-which-is-better/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>John Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://compscistuff.com/?p=274#comment-86</guid>
		<description>The above comment is ..to use common terms he may understand...RETARDED</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The above comment is ..to use common terms he may understand&#8230;RETARDED</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Sheppard</title>
		<link>http://compscistuff.com/2009/01/thin-client-applications-web-app-vs-thick-client-application-software-app-which-is-better/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>John Sheppard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://compscistuff.com/?p=274#comment-73</guid>
		<description>A winforms applications is far easier and quicker to build than a web based application.  Thin clients don&#039;t always have to be web apps either. I dont understand why there is this huge trend towards web apps. It&#039;s retarded, the UI is just a hack. For mine, use winforms and citrix/terminal or the linux equivolent for internal business applications. 

I hate the HTML and the web, I wish it would bugger off and the world would develop with winforms. :) Yay for winforms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A winforms applications is far easier and quicker to build than a web based application.  Thin clients don&#8217;t always have to be web apps either. I dont understand why there is this huge trend towards web apps. It&#8217;s retarded, the UI is just a hack. For mine, use winforms and citrix/terminal or the linux equivolent for internal business applications. </p>
<p>I hate the HTML and the web, I wish it would bugger off and the world would develop with winforms. <img src='http://compscistuff.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Yay for winforms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

